by WWM | Jan 10, 2017 | Market Commentary
I just wanted to link to a recent Vanguard USA webcast on their “2017 Market and Economic Outlook”.
The link goes to the transcript page, but the video can be accessed near the top. You should also be able to download slides from the presentation on the video page. I say “should” as over time links and access rights change and information ceases to exist. So no guarantees this video and slides will be there forever.
No thoughts from me right now. I am attending a separate Vanguard webcast for financial advisors later this month. After digesting both sessions, I shall add some personal opinions on Vanguard’s outlook for 2017.
I realize time is always at a premium. But many investment houses, banks, fund companies, etc., offer investors free and interesting resources to improve investing knowledge and skills.
My one caveat with free information. Much of it is very good, I am a big fan of Vanguard. But always consider the source and whether or not they may have any biases or motivations in their free resources.
I try to link to many of these on twitter at @Wilson_Wealth, so please feel free to head to my twitter page for potentially useful information provided by others.
by WWM | Jan 6, 2017 | Financial Advisors
There are many options and factors in choosing a competent financial advisor who meets your needs.
There are a multitude of advisor groups offering their services. Many with different professional qualifications, areas of expertise, experience levels, and methods of compensation for their services.
We will look at these items over the next few posts.
Today we will review technical qualifications.
Certifications alone do not guarantee that a financial advisor is competent. Not by any stretch. Experience and expertise in your areas of need are imperative. However, possessing appropriate professional credentials should be the bare minimum for consideration. Start with professional designation, then work your way through the other competence factors.
Also, as we shall see below, professional credentials may provide you with comfort in other aspects.
Just for disclosure purposes, please note that I hold Chartered Financial Analyst, Chartered Professional Accountant (Chartered Accountant), and Certified Financial Planner (CFP®) designations. I try to be objective, but bear in mind there may be some hidden bias.
Alphabet Soup of Designations
In most jurisdictions, anyone can call themselves a “financial planner” or “financial advisor”. No formal credentials are normally required to make this claim.
I shall not enumerate all the certificates out there. The Globe and Mail nicely summarizes various Canadian relevant professional designations in, “Decoding the alphabet soup of financial qualifications”. Investopedia also outlines many offered designations in, “The Alphabet Soup of Financial Certifications”.
In Canada, you will also see advisors with Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) designations. In many instances, CPAs may have advanced competence in one or more of: personal and corporate taxation, business valuations, financial statement analysis, or trustee matters. Areas normally outside, or more in-depth, than the scope of other advisor training.
That said, in Canada there was a recent merger of Chartered Accountants, Certified Management Accountants, and Certified General Accountants. Individuals now operating under the CPA designation may have significantly different training and experience. Ensure you find a fit between a specific CPA’s competence levels and your own requirements.
I will not get into the “which is best” discussion as each financial advisor designation has its pros and cons. Often what is a positive for one client’s needs may not be for another.
I will say though:
Make Sure Your Planner Has One of Them
With so many offered designations, your planner should have taken the time to get at least one.
If not, I question his commitment to his chosen profession. If someone cannot take the time to get certified in a relevant field, I wonder whether he has the time to stay current in his technical knowledge.
Also, a formal designation normally indicates membership in a professional organization. These organizations provide oversight of members which may enhance your comfort with an advisor.
When interviewing potential advisors, ensure you determine what degrees and designations they possess. After the meeting, go home and check out the certifications and associated professional organizations to better understand what the designation means to you.
A legitimate organization should have a website with ample information about their membership, professional program, offered services, ethics and standards for members, etc.
For example, Canadian advisors with CFP designations are members of the Financial Planning Standards Council. For illustrative purposes below, I will use this website to show you where to find exact information. And yes, I am a member in good standing of this organization.
You can also search the internet for reviews or discussion on a specific accreditation and analysis of a designation vis-à-vis alternatives.
Make Sure Your Planner has a Relevant Designation
Match your planner’s skill sets and experience with your wealth management needs.
Many readers require general financial planning and core investment advice. A Certified Financial Planner (CFP®), Personal Financial Planner (PFP), or Registered Financial Planner (RFP) designation might be somewhat interchangeable in their general advisory skills.
As an aside, the CFP designation is the most prevalent planner designation in Canada. PFP tends to be less common and used more by bank employees. RFP is the least common of the three. I am not equating technical expertise with prevalence. Simply that you will more likely meet a CFP professional when seeking financial planning than a PFP or RFP. Like Canadian accountants, I would not be surprised to see these three planning groups amalgamate over time.
Those advisors may be fine for overall planning requirements. But what if you desire complex life insurance strategies in your wealth planning? You may want to find someone with a Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) designation to add value. Or if you are more concerned with complex investment strategies, perhaps a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) is preferable.
If possible, factor in both current and expected future needs.
Say you are in your 20s and simply wish to create a portfolio of mutual funds. There are many firms licensed to sell funds. Perfect. But perhaps you expect to get married and start a family in the next 5 years. That may mean you will want expertise in income splitting, education planning, insurance, and so on.
You want to be able to grow with your advisor (or his firm) over time as your needs evolve. Otherwise, you will be changing advisors, and possibly investments, every time your life focus shifts.
Continuity is usually a good thing. Of course, do not continue to throw good money after bad just to keep with one mediocre firm. Most people do not think about their potential long term needs when starting out. Be sure you do. It may prevent issues later when your wealth management requirements expand.
Make Sure Your Planner is a Member in Good Standing
Ensure your advisor is a member in good standing in the associated professional organizations. The advisor should be able to provide proof of current good standing.
Many professional organizations allow the public to search their databases for individual members. For example, via the FPSC website, one can easily find a specific advisor with a Canadian CFP designation.
Or, if you are just trying to find advisors in your city, you can search the database by location, client type, areas of speciality, and even languages spoken. A useful tool to better match clients with suitable advisors.
A person who is no longer a current member of an organization should not – normally, cannot – use the designation in his work.
Individuals not in good standing may indicate problems. Perhaps they are suspended or terminated for past acts. Perhaps they did not maintain continuing education requirements. Maybe they simply let their membership lapse. There are a few possibilities. The bottom line is if someone claims to hold a professional certification it had better be current. If not, they are deceiving you and I suggest they be avoided.
Also, check as to where the advisor is a member in good standing. A CFP® recognized in India or Australia is not the same as one issued in Canada. Advisors must be competent with the legislation and planning issues relevant to the jurisdiction in which they operate.
For example, as a Canadian CFP professional, I understand how Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans function and how various forms of income are taxed. This aids in effectively structuring client portfolios on a tax-effective basis. But would an advisor with a CFP® from India or Japan have the same understanding? That is like dropping me into Switzerland with my Canadian specific knowledge and be expected to opine immediately on the Swiss Three Pillar pension system. Make certain that the person’s designation is eligible for use in your jurisdiction and that the experience matches your needs.
Of course, some designations are better suited for transferability than others. Writing options strategies and evaluating public company shares is more or less consistent around the world. As a CFA, my learning curve is fairly short to non-existent whether I am working in New York, Toronto, or Singapore. It makes sense that the CFA designation is globally recognized, rather than country by country specific.
Organizations Provide Oversight
In theory, professional organizations have significant oversight on their members. Many organizations require their members to follow professional standards and codes of ethics unique to the organization. This provides some comfort that your advisor will deal with you in a fair and honest manner.
Continuing with our Canadian CFP® professional example from above, the Standards of Professional Responsibility are clearly laid out for people to review. Quite comprehensive. I recommend you understand the important standards when dealing with a specific financial designation.
Additionally, most organizations require their members to maintain a minimum level of continuing education each year. Canadian CFP professionals are required to complete a minimum of 25 hours of approved continuing education each year. This helps ensure that members’ skills stay strong and current.
When considering potential advisors, review their organizations’ websites. You should easily find information as to what standards are applied to members. It is well worth knowing how your advisor should act, especially in respect of fiduciary duties, ethics, and standards of care.
The concept of whether the advisor has fiduciary duties is important. We will cover this issue separately.
In reality, each professional organization will have its share of bad apples and it is difficult to police. Look at Bernie Madoff (or numerous others). The actual regulators audited his business and he was able to fool them for a good while. So do not expect perfection from any professional institute. But it is better than dealing with someone who has no defined standard of care nor professional oversight.
Also, professional organizations are useful should you have a conflict with your advisor. You can file a complaint and it will be investigated. No member wants to be sanctioned, so reputable advisors do try and adhere to their professional standards. Outside the legal system, you may have little recourse against an advisor who is not a member in good standing of a professional institute.
If you have a complaint against a Canadian CFP professional, the process is clearly spelled out for members as well as the public. Again, this process should exist in most professional organizations.
Summary
With all the available financial certifications out there, your potential advisor should hold one or more. If not, find out why. It could be laziness, being expelled from an organization, or another red flag. Be safe, stick with an advisor who is certified and a member in good standing of a recognized professional institute within your domicile.
A potential advisor should be able to explain the relevance of his designations. He should be able to compare and contrast his credentials against other common certificates. He should also be able to highlight key ethical and standards of conduct under which he operates. Finally, he should point out any limitations. If he is not a CLU, for example, perhaps he does not feel comfortable incorporating complex insurance strategies in your wealth management plan.
After the interview, conduct an internet search to understand what the designation means. Compare it to other offered designations and what you were informed in the meeting. If you know people in the financial services sector, seek their input. Do the certified skill sets meet your needs? Is it a reputable designation in your jurisdiction? Are other designations available that better meet your future requirements?
Review the professional organization. What are the standards imposed on its members? Ethics and maintenance of technical proficiency are important. Is there a systematic process for filing a complaint against an advisor? There should be. Is your potential advisor listed as a member? Not all organizations do list active members, but many do provide information on advisors located in your region.
That is step one. Some work, yes. But finding the right financial advisor should be worth the effort.
by WWM | Jan 5, 2017 | Financial Advisors
I was speaking with someone recently about finding a good financial planner. His problem was that he knew the questions to ask potential advisors, but he could not properly assess the answers he received.
For example, he knew that he should ask what credentials the planner possesses. But how to compare a CFP, PFP, RFP, SFC, CA, CFA, CPA, CLU, CFC, CSWP, etc., etc., etc.? It is a virtual dog’s breakfast of designations out there. And that is just Canada.
The issue of finding the right financial planner is kind of a catch 22. You really need to know the financial services industry in order to understand and differentiate the responses from potential advisors. But if you know the answers, you probably do not need to interview a bunch of professionals.
So what should a teacher, fireman, nurse, engineer, home builder, etc., do?
There is plenty of information on how to find the right financial advisor or planner for your unique needs. Some decent, some quite weak. To try and separate the wheat from the chaff I shall add my own thoughts.
Financial Advisor versus Financial Planner
First, I want to differentiate between an “advisor” and “planner”.
Financial advisors cover the whole gamut of people who provide financial advice. Bankers, accountants, tax lawyers, brokers, asset managers, insurance agents, etc., etc. Someone who provides a financial related service.
Financial planners are a subset of financial advisors. They can provide a variety of services, but financial planning should focus on developing long-term planning programs for financial success.
In reality, a little more complex than that and there is often overlap and grey areas. But the point is, a financial planner is a financial advisor. A financial advisor is not necessarily a financial planner.
When I write, I tend to use the term “advisor” rather than “planner” as the former is more encompassing. If I limit my commentary to “planner”, just remember the distinction.
Questions to Ask a Potential Financial Advisor
There are many different lists out there with things to consider when interviewing a financial advisor. Some have more considerations, some have less. Key issues are usually the same.
For this post, we will go through the US Certified Financial Planner (CFP) Board’s “10 Questions to Ask Your Planner”. They focus on planners, but most of the points relate to all advisors.
Just to add to your confusion, please note that I hold a Canadian CFP designation. Similar in nature, but legally different than a US CFP. And I am governed by a different professional organization, the Financial Planning Standards Council.
Here are the US CFP questions you should ask prospective advisors.
- What experience do you have?
- What are your qualifications?
- What financial planning services do you offer?
- What is your approach to financial planning?
- What types of clients do you typically work with?
- Will you be the only financial planner working with me?
- How will I pay for your financial planning services?
- How much do you typically charge?
- Do others stand to gain from the financial advice you give me?
- Have you ever been publicly disciplined for any unlawful or unethical actions in your career?
Not a bad list.
I Would Also Add
What relevant professional organizations are you a member?
Are you acting in a fiduciary capacity?
Can I have it in writing?
You Will Want to Dig a Little Deeper
While the US CFP article offers good advice, you need to dig a little deeper in your questioning and comprehension. For example, question 4 asks, “What is your approach to financial planning?”.
The article states:
“Make sure the planner’s investing philosophy isn’t too cautious or overly aggressive for your needs. Learn how he will carry out recommendations or refer tasks to others.”
Yes, it is important to find an advisor who shares your risk perspective. An overly aggressive advisor will provide sleepless nights of stress. An overly cautious advisor will frustrate you. But there is much more to one’s “approach to financial planning” (or advising) than caution or aggression.
Questions and Concerns are Interrelated
Over time, we will dig deeper into what you should consider when assessing potential financial advisors.
Qualifications
One key area is the advisor’s technical qualifications.
Qualifications and credentials will usually determine one’s approach to advising and specific services offered. I would expect to see a tax accountant providing personal tax planning strategies as a priority. I would not expect an insurance agent (at least one with no personal tax qualifications) focussing on preparing income tax returns.
Advisors with formal financial designations normally are members of recognized professional organizations. These organizations provide oversight and guidance to its members.
That may include ongoing professional education requirements to ensure members maintain a base competency. It may include standards of conduct and ethics which the member is required to follow, including whether the advisor acts as a fiduciary. It may include a complaint and disciplinary process for members who violate codes of conduct. This oversight may provide clients with a level of comfort in that they have some recourse in the event of problems with their advisor.
Experience
A second key area is the advisor’s experience.
Technical qualifications are one thing, having the actual experience to properly deal with a client’s needs is another. Financial advising covers a wide range of topics. It is difficult for one advisor to excel in many areas simultaneously. Either work with a firm that provides experts in a variety of fields. Or when assessing advisors, focus on those who meet your primary needs.
Offering
The third key area is the service offering.
Among the 10 questions listed above, you should consider the advisor’s overall approach to financial planning (or advising). Then the actual products and services provided. Finally, the type of clients served.
An advisor’s skill set, experience, and (most definitely) employer will drive these items. I consider the overall approach, products and services offered, and type of client served, collectively as the service offering.
For example, perhaps you deal with a financial advisor working for a bank. Probably lots of emphasis on tax-deferred retirement accounts. With suitable investments typically being a fund or other investment product created and vended by that bank. Further, if you are working with a generic advisor based in a small, retail branch, his or her clients are mainly those with lower asset volumes and less complex needs.
We will look at the service offering later. The big thing is to find someone that has experience with clients of your asset volume and objectives. It is more than simply whether the advisor matches your aggressiveness.
Compensation
Finally, advisor compensation is always an issue.
In broad strokes, you will see three forms of compensation. An advisor may be commission based, where you are not directly charged for the advice or planning. Instead, the advisor is compensated by his employer and/or commissions and/or retrocessions on product sales.
Advisors may charge fees. These may be hourly rates, a flat fee per engagement, or a combination where the flat fee is a minimum or a maximum. In this case, the client pays the advisor directly for his work.
For example, an advisor may charge $300 per hour for advice. Or he may estimate that the engagement requires 10 hours of work and quotes a flat $3000. Or he may provide a buffer in case of unforeseen issues flaring up or work going smoother than anticipated. So he may provide a quote that indicates a flat fee of $3000 with an additional charge of $300 per hour for any work in excess of 10 hours. Or, from the other perspective, an hourly rate of $300 with a cap of $3000.
If you are a potential client, knowing the maximum possible fee is nice.
Advisors may also be compensated in a hybrid approach. They charge clients for some work and receive compensation from employers and/or third parties (e.g., mutual fund companies) for other services.
Be sure you clearly understand how fees will be charged. If you expect a bill for 10 hours work, totally $3000, and suddenly you receive an invoice for 20 hours and $6000, it is a problem for you.
Suddenly, commission based advisors with their “free” advice may look good. Perhaps. But as we shall see, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Someone is paying for the product or service. At the end of the day, that will be you. What you often end up paying in the long run for “free” advice can be expensive.
One other point on compensation. If your advisor outsources a portion of your work, understand if there are any referral fees involved.
For example, your investment advisor refers his clients to a local tax accountant to prepare tax returns for his clients. This expands the service offering and may be a nice add-on for clients. Yes. But determine what financial arrangements, direct or indirect, are in place for the referrals. Are you being referred to a competent third party or simply someone who kicks back a percentage of the fees on the referral?
Get It in Writing!
Not necessarily a question, but when assessing prospective advisors always obtain the terms of service in writing. Something that lays out what services will be provided for the fee. And how that fee will be assessed. It minimizes misunderstandings and can serve as a template for work moving forward.
Okay, enough generalities, let us now take a look at some areas in more detail.
by WWM | Jan 4, 2017 | Uncategorized
Welcome to the “Wealth Management Commentary” page.
I shall leave this post “sticky”, so please scroll down for newer content.
I intend to write on a variety of investment and wealth topics. That cover specific issues in some depth and hopefully in layman’s language. I shall start with core concepts to set the building blocks. Then progress to more advanced topics.
The goal is to assist you develop a better understanding of wealth management and make you a better overall investor.
I recommend you begin with the oldest posts, then work your way chronologically back through the articles.
Why the Commentary?
My objective in writing is two-fold.
One, create building blocks of knowledge, so that you better understand wealth management and investing. The more you learn about wealth management, the wiser decisions you will make, and the more long-term success you will achieve.
Two, provide this information in clear language that does not require an investment degree to understand. And I hope in a manner that offers interesting reads.
I do not think investing is an overly difficult subject. However, the wealth management industry does a great job complicating the subjects within. My goal is to try and clarify the issues for investors who spend their days consumed with their own careers, families, and social life. Not having to become investment professionals themselves.
No sales pitches nor self-promotion from me in these posts. I do cover these topics with my clients, as I believe knowledgeable clients makes my work easier. But I am not using these posts to garner new business. Just a way to give back and improve financial education. So no pesky email follow-ups, nor subscriptions or secret handshakes required.
Structure and Format
Topics covered will be general in nature. Investors are unique. Your personal circumstances may lead to different decisions than another investor. We are building a knowledge base in these articles. So that you may better understand the process and properly communicate with your financial advisors. We are not making specific investment recommendations.
When starting out, I recommend beginning with the oldest posts and work back. The articles and subject areas tend to build on each other in order. For example, risk and return, followed by asset classes, then asset allocations, etc.
Each subject builds on the previous ones. Reading chronologically will make the knowledge flow much easier to follow.
Keep Updated on New Content
You can stop by this Wealth Management Commentary page periodically to check for new content. I hate having to subscribe to websites, so I do not do that on my own sites.
Or you can find any new content when posted via Twitter or Facebook.
On Twitter, I often tweet quick thoughts on current events. I also retweet and comment on interesting wealth management links from other parties. Tweets update on my Facebook page.
There is some excellent information out there. If I think it adds value to readers, I shall pass it on via Twitter or Facebook. To stay up to date, please feel free to follow me at either medium.
Thanks and best of success as you work to improve your investment knowledge.
Jordan Wilson